#AI Music Software

[ai-revolution]

Artificial Intelligence Revolutionizes the Music World: The Case of "Neural Notes Revolution"

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming our world, permeating sectors from healthcare to industry, education to transportation. This technology, which aims to replicate and surpass human cognitive abilities, promises to revolutionize the way we live and work.

The applications of AI are numerous and ever-expanding: from medical diagnosis to autonomous driving, data analysis to content creation. A particularly intriguing field is music, where AI is demonstrating remarkable potential.

Recently, there has been much discussion about AI-based music generation platforms like "Suno" and "Udio," accused of violating numerous artists' copyrights to train their algorithms. These controversies highlight the complex ethical and legal issues that AI raises in the artistic field.

In this context, the Italian project "Neural Notes Revolution" emerges, demonstrating how, with the aid of AI programs, the study of algorithms suitable for targeted generation of musical styles, voices, song structures, and with adequate post-processing, it's possible to produce musical pieces of any genre and style, in any language, in relatively short timeframes.

The project also leverages other generative AI platforms such as OpenAI's ChatGPT (Microsoft group, of which Elon Musk was a co-founder), Anthropic's Claude AI, and Google's Gemini. These technologies allow for the generation of texts, both original and based on precise or imaginative prompts, in numerous languages, even using expressions typical of specific localities and dialects.

However, "Neural Notes Revolution" still faces some challenges. The results provided by ChatBOTs require careful verification, and in the music field, generation platforms have significant limitations. In particular, "Suno" and "Udio" lack a precise and rigorous syntax that allows for accurate results. Often, the outcomes are even opposite to those desired, forcing a trial-and-error approach. One of the major limitations is the near-total impossibility of having clear style changes within the same song.

Expected future developments include the ability to modify produced songs in a targeted manner. It would be useful to have separate files for the vocal part, the musical backing, and the lyrics in subtitle format. Moreover, there's hope to be able to modify individual parts of text or music, and above all, to have a correct and rigorously respected syntax for the song structure and use of styles.

The use of these platforms raises several issues. On one hand, they offer new creative possibilities and democratize music production. On the other, they raise concerns about copyright, artistic authenticity, and the future of work in the music industry.

In conclusion, while giving space to creativity, we are still far from competing with the styles, voices, and tones of artists of all time. However, in defense of the "new artists" of the AI era, it must be recognized that creativity and skill are still necessary to produce musical pieces of a certain depth. This is particularly relevant in a modern musical landscape that often offers music devoid of artistic and cultural significance. AI in music thus represents both a challenge and an opportunity, requiring a balance between technological innovation and preservation of human artistic expression.

[outofcontextai]

[mayordeas-clone]

saw a take that peeved me in the vocaloid feed on bluesky but i don’t wanna be confrontational there + my thoughts are too powerful for a 300 character per post thread so im making it tumblr’s problem

due to my intense vsynth brainworms this is going to sound incredibly pedantic and annoying which is why i am posting it here okay here we go

the post was sort of a ‘callout’ of a creator who uses synthv for covers of fnf songs or whatever. the general body was like “they write their own lyrics but they make the vocals using ai with a program called synthesizer v” (the implication being, “this person is an ai-using fraud, don’t support them”)

if ur in the community or like have a little bit of an idea of how ai is associated with synthv specifically this is a nonsense uninformed take (the ‘ai’ training is used for autotuning/cross language synthesis/some other shit idk but the point is it’s not the type of ai that like, writes the melody/lyrics for you and is voiced from random samples from unknowing providers but i’ll get back to this later)

ai is mentioned on synthv’s website (also vocaloid’s much to the detriment of news articles that report on hatsune miku) so it’s a common misunderstanding, whatever. it would be nice if people actually looked into the ways ai works in vsynth at least a little bit but in an age where artists are on the defense against the ai boogeyman i guess i sorta understand the knee jerk reaction to assume the ai in vsynth software like synthv is the Bad kind. annoying, but nothing new.

but i think what made this post rotate in my mind to the point of crystallizing into unnecessary rage is an add-on that was like “i just prefer my music to be sung by real people!” followed by “by the way, vocaloid isn’t ai, so no you’re not bad if you like hatsune miku music”

ohhh man this actually did piss me off a little cuz wow way to really shout to the heavens that you have no damn clue what you’re talking about

firstly, i COMPLETELYYYY understand that the premise and general sound of vocal synth music is not for everyone. the computerized words, the unrealism, or even the fact that it’s not an actual person singing, like whatever that’s fine i get it. but like you can’t go around and be like “by the way vocaloid [aka hatsune miku] is chill don’t worryyyy” bc that line of thinking from my understanding doesn’t really make sense? miku isn’t a real person either 😭😭 her latest release even uses ai! (at least i think it does cuz vocaloid 6 has ai support but idk i guess that doesn’t matter) does she just get a free pass cuz she’s an internet darling?

miku is a piece of software where you write the midi for her vocals and input the lyrics so a slurry of samples recorded by saki fujita can be played back in an in-character singing voice. synthv is a piece of software with similar character voice databases where you do the same thing, write a midi and input lyrics so a database’s voice samples put it all together to sing back. the inclusion of ai in this process is to streamline the workflow for the user to automatically work out the pitch transitions between notes to save on time manually tuning, creating a more realistic playback. this ai, perhaps merely the inclusion of these two letters in the proximity of synthv’s marketing, is what makes synthv both Significantly Different and Inferior to miku.

the lack of ai with vocaloid (as far as op knew, cuz need i remind you vocaloid as of its 6th installment uses similar ai to synthv lol) making it Better than synthv sent the implication, TO ME, that op thinks that the ai used in synthv is the type that like, takes samples from other people without their permission to create the voices (then leading to the “i just want my songs sung by REAL people” aka not sung by dubiously gathered samples). i recognize this means of creating ai voices to impersonate other people and make them say things they should not without their knowledge or permission is CERTAINLY bad but like that’s not how any of this works if we’re talking synthv (you could argue this applies to those utau banks that make voicebanks for like sonic the hedgehog and shit but those usually sound like ass and are about as convincing as a sentence mixed youtube poop). maybe that’s not what they meant (i don’t wanna dig up the post cuz i don’t wanna be bothered and it’s probably gonna piss me off to the point of starting something which i don’t want) but based on my understanding of their point this is like. wholly untrue. in fact synthv voicebanks (particularly those from eclipsed sounds whose terms of service are free to read on their website) have special terms specifically designed to protect the voice providers of their databases BECAUSE of the extra realism in their voices (terms such as, “you can’t credit any voice work done with Solaria to Emma Rowley [her voice provider] or anyone else besides the software itself” in the case Solaria is used to say something objectionable and cast it on Rowley, that would be a breach of the terms and might even get your license revoked). shit like that is likely what people who are afraid of ai voices expect to happen but there were contracts signed to protect and inform the voice providers of what their vocal likeness is being used for + compensation paid to them for their work providing vocal samples SPECIFICALLY for this product. and ofc miku is the same. ITS THE SAME. BUT MIKU IS A FUNNY INTERNET MEME SO SHES FINE. GRRRRR!!!!!!

[gaytobymeres]

i do actually feel kind of over spotify

[thisismyanimus]

hijacking the tags

i imagine that this post will show up if you search for a combination of any two words appearing here

if you like any of those topics or are brazilian, hit me up, follow me, message me, idk

se você gosta de algum desses tópicos ou é brasileiro, me segue ou manda mensagem

[digitalsoftwareproductreviews]

GPTSongs AI Review: Create Music with AI Innovation!

Welcome to my GPTSongs AI Review post. In the steadily developing scene of man-made consciousness, the presentation of GPTSongs computer based intelligence denotes a huge achievement. This progressive application, completely fueled by OpenAI's most recent man-made intelligence innovation, ChatGPT-4o, vows to change the manner in which we make music.

By utilizing progressed man-made intelligence abilities, GPTSongs computer based intelligence can turn your thoughts, catchphrases, and voice orders into dazzling artificial intelligence produced tunes. This survey digs into the elements, usefulness, and likely effect of GPTSongs computer based intelligence on the music business and then some.

The Evolution of AI in Music Creation:

Computerized reasoning has been causing disturbances in different ventures, and music is no special case. From man-made intelligence produced organizations to virtual artists, the reconciliation of computer based intelligence in music creation has opened up additional opportunities. Nonetheless, GPTSongs simulated intelligence makes this a stride further by offering a complete arrangement that joins the force of OpenAI's ChatGPT-4o with easy to use elements to make great tunes easily.

>>>>>>Click Here To Get GPTSongs AI

[nine-aetharia]

real talk. how many of y'all think hatsune miku is AI

[shivamthakrejr]

Daniel Bedingfield, Will.i.am, and Sachin Dev Duggal lead the revolution in AI in music

"I spent the last few days creating a new drum and bass album using AI, which is better than any D&B I've created in 20 years," Bedingfield said. "I wrote my voice on some songs and put it into the AI; it used my soul to do other things because it was based on the DNA of my song."

The "Gotta Get Through This" hitmaker believes AI will be "brutal" for many musicians as it disrupts the traditional music-making process. However, he argues that ultimately it democratizes music by placing "unlimited and unlimited creativity" in the hands of new artists and those who appear. Bedingfield compared the AI's power to that of famous artists such as Stevie Wonder and Prince, who are known for being able to play instruments, create, and complete songs entirely by themselves. "But now AI is putting this limitless creativity in the hands of many young people and filmmakers," he said.

Pop star Will.i.am, winner of seven Grammy Awards and a Latin Grammy Award, joined forces with Sachin Dev Duggal to prepare for the introduction of AI in music at an important conference on music and technology in Davos.

As the power of AI continues to advance, the idea of Natasha Bedingfield suggests a future in which human artists will become more powerful with AI to create music that transcends traditional genres and expectations. This collaborative process, as envisioned by Bedingfield and supported by Sachin Dev Duggal, can democratize music production, making it more inclusive than ever. While the debate continues as to whether AI can truly capture the "soul" of artists, Bedingfield remains steadfast in his belief that technology should be embraced as a creative tool. a strength that enhances rather than diminishes human expression and innovation.

[graciousdragon]

i found this poor attempt of a song mashup while going through my old projects in capcut the other night. believe me when i tell you it sounded way worse when i found it. here it is, finished and edited so it only sounds slightly off-timing. i will now inflict you all with this cursed ass audio. enjoy!! :D

[warznymph]

I WANNA BE SOFTWARE

New Single

[animemusicbrackets]

for the bracket, are songs using Synthesizer V vocals allowed? i know you said that utau was alright, but i just wanted to make sure before i put my submission in

yes synthesizer v is fine to submit

[musicforprogramming]

Alpine Flight by Pauline Anna Strom

Also listen on: Spotify: https://bit.ly/music-4-programming Apple Music: https://apple.co/40d72VT Taken from Spectre, is the third album by the late West Coast composer Pauline Anna Strom. First released in 1984, the album explores the darker corridors of human mythology under the influence of vampiric lore, evoking a hushed gothic solitude and showcasing Strom's breathtaking dexterity of sound design. Restored and mixed from the original reels by Marta Salogni, and newly remastered, this is the album’s first ever official reissue, and the definitive edition of a visionary statement.

[autisticmight]

sorry that vocaloid "hot take" (come on. it's been a ~hot take~ since like 2003. it is lukewarm at this point) is just. so annoying to me. genuinely upsetting. i am also a singer!!! so are a bunch of the people who lend their voices to vocaloid!!! vocal synths are a way to sing when you can't; a voice that you will never yourself have come from your mouth but which still shapes the words that you cannot!!!

dismissing them in such a way just feels disrespectful to all of the humans involved in the vocal synth community, from the producers to artists to animators to the humans who cover those songs, all of whom add a little part of themselves to the songs

[mercutiodidntdieforthis]

The crazy thing is I can't even think of a job that isn't physical labor that is in demand and that you can't just get a machine to do for free. If anyone here doesn't know by now, I'm not avoiding physical labor for no reason, I am disabled lol

[lucidic-ghouls]

im listening to this youtuber go on about defending AI and how it's a tool that will help younger artists and it'll be easier than it is for us when we were younger and a lot of points that are proven false and just straight up ignorant. Theyre claiming that AI isnt destorying the art or music industries' as if the last year and a half haven't been shit because of what AI is taking from creatives and executive's aren't taking advantage of this "tool". The rant itself is very selfish and gross. I'm trying to hear the whole thing but their points are arguable and lacking. This whole thing started bc a bigger youtuber commented ( politely mind you) on their AI music video, saying how it's just as damaging to musicians as it is to illustrators. The youtuber in question cannot handle any sort of critique and it's pretty sad. I enjoyed them on Tiktok as that's how i originally found them. AI Can be a tool. But how they and others are using it are NOT a tool to help grow but stunt.

Also her video is a whole slap to the face to those who are in legal battles to actually regulate AI.

crazy how someone can be loud and wrong.